CREATED 8/10/2024
LAST UPDATED: 10/11/2025
I have provided you some links to YT creators I believe are interesting however it does not mean I blindly follow them nor I 100% agree with them. I want you to listen to some of their content and make your own mind which you will do, right?
Once I got saturated enough with the red pill content I realised fairly quickly that these men who revolve around female hypergamy will get you nowhere.
What women do when selecting a man makes sense.
Believe it or not but humans have not evolved much since the Stone Age.
All what you are looking at is a prehistoric humankind with a number of facelifts over the millennia but the underlying operating system is the same.
It is a very old school method of selection but it did work for females of different species for millions of years. Why would women change that just because some men are dissatisfied with it?
The fact that in humans quite often it produces bizarre results it’s a topic perhaps for another time.
Remember that women are driven by their different than men’s psyche where apparently (unlike in men) everything is connected with everything (like in that joke) what the Phoenicians have extrapolated by employing hundreds of millions of unsecure women into their social media platforms.
The so called Beta male have followed the trend.
There isn’t a better way to help your weaker form factor than building a more robust network of contacts for protection. Imagine a tribe in the stone age. Women spent hundreds of thousands of years in the caves and huts to excel in emotional intelligence/manipulation and the communication is everything. Social media platform(s) is like a village fireplace on steroids.
On the other hand men’s emotional intelligence either supposed to be blunt, suppressed (warriors, soldiers, pioneers) or very responsive to women’s signalling like it is in the case of Beta males who form the inner protective circle including most male artists who keep singing the same love songs over and over again about them being at blame and apologising.
I remember that documentary about the mating season of squids. Some big squid studs fought fearlessly between each other for female squids but there were some male squids, usually smaller ones who resorted to a different tactic. They pretend to be a female squid then to sneak in between the preoccupied studs and mate with the females.
Same here. Human male studs (Alphas) think they are spreading their genetics better than Betas do but I would not be surprised that it’s the opposite especially at this stage of the human civilisation where human habitats are congested and different abilities take priority. I reckon what you are looking at are mostly Betas where some Betas pretend Alphas just to position themselves better among other Betas.
Don’t forget that they are all obsessed with women and cannot see beyond them. They always take priority.
Even Miles W. Mathis cannot see beyond that. The heterosexual men suddenly flip to gay men. There isn’t anything in between. Either men obsessed with women or men obsessed with other men.
A lot of the so called muscled Chads are intellectually inferior to women they sleep with. They just have to make the right impression to the outsiders but while at home walk on their toes.
Let me guess how many studs have been kicked out of “their” apartments this week because they didn’t comply?
On the other hand men value beauty of the opposite sex above everything else. This is as ambitious as women who promote and pursue narcissistic and abusive men.
The demand for beta males is also there especially to justify the narcissism in women.
Same like women go after what they believe exceptional men men pursue exceptionally beautiful women.
You won’t convince me that it’s different, I have seen it while hanging with beautiful women. Silly men have a hard time controlling themselves while the “smart” ones use all sort of manoeuvres to pretend that female beauty is not messing up with their heads.
The behaviour of other women is even worse because they come from the place of insecurity and jealousy kicks in big time.
Unfortunately the tendency of people to form asymmetrical relationships is overwhelming and this leads to all sorts of pathological arrangements.
It’s a fact that on both sides the levels of attraction are very different.
And I actually know why is that but I won’t tell you.
Regarding women who limit sex as long as its not a result of her neuroticism and/or narcissism this makes a perfect sense.
Women create demand for sex while men want more supply. If supply of high quality female to male interaction was unlimited it would render sex worthless. Women would not be attractive any more.
Hookers, escorts, prostitutes who satisfy the demand for sex in exchange for money if you like it or not do a great service to men whose confidence would otherwise collapse due to different reasons – a terrible wife or being unattractive. Besides there are other grey areas people don’t want to talk about like other female services that seem normal but satisfy the demand of male-female interaction e.g. female hairdressers, female massage therapist and house maids. Not all of them are outright whores.
Besides Jesus hung out with a prostitute so he must understand how this social fabric is not free of hypocrisy.
Do you remember Bo Ferec gently nudging some of his men to pay prostitute a visit?
However sex mileage does matter and somehow women know that high sex mileage is detrimental.
Anyway women cannot resist exceptional men like men cannot resist exceptionally beautiful women and quite often regular men lose their minds and behave like dogs when a beautiful woman is around. Even married men while walking with their wives trip because they see a beautiful lady. I have seen that many times!
Men’s testosterone is not to be controlled.
Both sexes exercise some form of discrimination towards the opposite sex e.g. Miles Mathis does not paint ugly women.
In general there is something off with some of these red pill men. It’s either them themselves or their bad experiences with women OR BOTH. It could well be the Intelligence is on it as well especially the father of Red Pill movement Rollo Tomassi (real name George W. Miller) who is friends with Robert Kiyosaki of the Navy.
I don’t want to generalise when speaking about red pill men and women however there are few important points that these men bring and I think this is true:
1. familiarity breeds contempt – a women gets fed up with a man she lives under the same roof for quite some time (unless he is 100% compatible with her and for that is rewarded with offspring)
2. due to the time constraints in women’s mating most women at a young age have to settle for a faithful but an average men, not the best, second best according to them, to their hypergamous standards. Then over time a particular woman has a hard time to reconcile this dilemma in her mind what eventually translates into resentment and bad behaviour towards her partner.
Two funny but insightful quotes I came across:
“A man is incomplete until he’s married. Then he’s finished.”
“They say behind every successful man is a woman. And behind her is a divorce lawyer just in case.”
Indeed men on their own can and do lack motivation and women are there to keep them preoccupied and busy quite often just for the sake of being busy. If you lived on this planet for long enough you probably already realised that not much can be done. There is plenty of roadblocks and human limitations that appear at every corner.
I think it’s good that men educate themselves about these things because it is true that in general women act in their own interest and are instrumental of men.
Ideally we want the narcissistic women not to bear any children but they can and do with the simps they find.
After watching John’s most recent video where he points at the demons and the devil I can’t wait when this man is going to run out of steam. He makes daily videos to boost his audience but you cannot be that productive every day even with these clickbait thumbnails. I actually don’t like his thumbnails – most of them look sinister while the videos themselves do not express that paranoia.
Just by looking at the thumbnails of his videos he definitely demonises women and capitalises on your fear of highly narcissistic women.
My impression is that he was in a relationship with a narcissists and that’s how he perceives women in general, cannot help it. I see the similar thing with Casey Zander who comprehends women based on his hot vs feminine matrix which is some modified version of the old school hot vs crazy matrix but I don’t buy it.
I can agree with some of the stuff Bo Ferec (Legion of Men) proposes but I do not support his “elevated people” thing.
I do agree with some of the stuff Rich Cooper (Entrepreneurs in Cars) talks about but both Bo and Rich recycle the same topics over and over again just to waste more of your time. I understand that the dating scene (exactly a scene because you have to be a good actor to succeed at it) in US and Western Europe is pretty bad but they do generalise and throw the worst examples at you to make the argument and perhaps to help their own insecurity?
If they are so masculine why do they spend so much time talking about it (feels like some sort of insecurity and/or just a way of making money of other men). Why are they so concerned about other men and unfaithful women? They don’t have this problem themselves! They should just sit quiet and enjoy their lives, no? They have the advantage over other man. Isn’t how it supposed to be?
Isn’t what a man supposed to do when he succeeds? I mean to remain quiet about their findings so they maintain the edge and do not upset women (including his partner).
I think any man wants to have an advantage over other men?
I can see this especially in Rich Cooper I mean his awkward position he put himself in. A masculine man whose partner is who exactly? A a friend with benefits, a prostitute?
If you ask me I don’t believe in female or male solidarity. As soon as the opposite sex is in the mix the backstabbing will occur. You can argue that gangs of men are better than the gangs of women but…
You also want to contemplate over the normal distribution of IQ of men (blue) and women (red).
There is at least 3 different vertical male to female arrangements that I can see here. It’s hard to imagine the representatives of just these 3 groups (there is a lot more combinations) coming to an agreement.
I understand that the man-woman interaction has not changed much since the Stone Age.
Just by taking the Stone Age into account which is 3.4 million years of killing and rape had huge impact on the formation of male and female brain and built in preferences.
A civilised man and civilised woman is a pretty new concept and even today it’s desirable to display atavistic attitudes. A wild jungle has been replaced with jungle of civilisation, jungle of trees with jungle of skyscrapers and women do indeed look for bad boys like they did 200 000 years ago.
Besides the barbaric martial arts gain in popularity.
Women due to their inherent insecurity promote narcissistic men in the society taking notorious lying and empty promises for confidence what in most cases is just false confidence. The idea is to create an illusion of instant delivery which then can be delayed indefinitely and it works! The financial markets reflect that as well!
I think the society grew unhealthy due to that demand for illusion, illusion of “all is great” and confidence at all cost. I think this reflects on the banking system very well where the core trust and confidence of the society is build on the sand of enormous debt.
Even when women in the very centre of civilisation look very different to those in the Stone Age (expensive clothes, jewellery, nails, some have fake eyelashes) their characteristics are very similar – they are narcissistic.
Predatory, duplicitous and corrupt men are in demand not those authentic (truly believable) worse those who are like an open book. It’s unreasonable if not dangerous in being honest, to expose yourself, be in any way vulnerable especially in the difficult times.
Men should not display their vulnerability, be emotional because this is how it used to be and should continue. Man up!
You know it is expected that every time the civilisation is undergoing a struggle (e.g. due to faulty financial cycles) men must cover for it and e.g. go to war, dodge bullets and die.
Speaking of Rich Cooper what woman would want to be with a guy who is famous for denouncing women publicly and doing it daily and for a living?
It feels like he is covering for some insecurity of his or what I said earlier this awkward position he as a heterosexual male put himself. Not single but not a husband either.
It could be the issue is my skewed understanding what is a result of the education system run by women.
It is difficult for me to understand this “red pill” niche these men propose to other men.
I think being single (including hermits) the so called MGTOW is the right thing to do especially in times when a relationship with a woman is difficult.
It’s because it is not longer a relationship with a woman but with her networks, her social media and her family (e.g. sisters they talk to every day on the phone). You are very lucky if you find a normal girl. You are lucky if you have a spoiled girl available only to you but it usually comes in a package with a bunch of other weird people you somehow have to put up with.
These women are augmented by the technology to the point of a hive mind. I let you judge how is this going to pan out. It is first time in history where due to technology any woman can without leaving her room, from her smart phone compare herself to other women and interact with dozens of men.
I think the social media led to women’s heightened appetites and continuous dissatisfaction.
A hybrid solution proposed by Bo and Rich is awkward. As I said before the fight clubs are not for me. One day Bo showed his web browser where he had like hundreds of tabs with YouTube videos opened. He will reprimand you for games, porn, alcohol and drugs but he himself is addicted to YouTube. He is very against the pornography and ridicules anyone who is its consumer but at the same time nudges to use prostitutes. What a great alternative?!
I don’t consider being a gym guy either who in free time (it seems he has plenty of it) is fishing for some YouTube videos to provide you with a DAILY feed of reaction videos. Seriously. I don’t consider this being the paramount of men’s capabilities.
Same like feminists generalise some of these influencers also generalise as it seems only experienced or present interactions with either crazy or narcissistic women.
That’s why I don’t support them as they create echo chambers (ghettos) for themselves and produce content for people alike.
Pearl
Pearl is quite popular. She came from some wealthy family. She is one of very few women who represent the black pill movement what supposed to be men’s business. Surprisingly she is one of very few women who is honest about her kind. She turned this into a show of sarcasm which makes sense.
I have looked into modern red-pill movement and it isn’t for me. I am not interested in hacking women’s minds. I have more interesting things to do.
I have looked into the original red-pill movement that currently is labelled as gold-pill and I think what they say makes the most sense however it feels that going against the gynocentrism where clearly women have the upper hand will get these men nowhere. This together with the Phoenician agendas reinforcing it makes it impossible to overturn.
From a psychological standpoint it is impossible to take the privileges back. Women nor Phoenicians want to cut on their spending habits. I don’t see any women embracing this ideology unless on some high intellectual level but then how many families with children will it produce?
Women due to their insecurity use to maintain versatile networks and exchange of information and currently because of the technology and apps it is on steroids.
Remember most women spend a substantial amount of time on the Phoenician social media platforms where they form a hive mind and are nothing more than SMTs – Social Media Transistors.
The Phoenicians exploit this natural tendency of women.
The simps and gay men form the outer protective layer in the circles of women what then the red pill adepts have to infiltrate.
I think black-pill makes the most sense however same as gold-pill it is a dead end ideology and men who support it will simply die out unless they organise in a different way. I think the majority always was comprised of simps (drones) and hookup artists (modern red-pill).
Supporting black or gold-pill is more like an intellectual exercise. Most men are drone-like and have no will to go against the tide. It is only the stagnant economy that prevents some of these men from signing an unfavourable contract otherwise they would.
Strong Successful Male
I come across this channel recently and I agree with some of the stuff he says but he is pushing the alpha male thing I disagree with. Recently he criticised a scientific paper from Germany where the scientists kind of challenged his idea. Since we know how the Phoenicians operate we know that ruling from the shadows (e.g. by a proxy) in this case through a man (who ruffles and flexes his muscles) is the best way. Even the Forbes list is a sham not to disclose the truly rich.
In the ant world while queens are deep in their chambers and well protected we supposed to believe that the hard working ant soldiers or ant drones are the leaders. No, they don’t, they just have to work harder or provide genetic diversity. That’s all.
If you really are in charge you don’t want to expose yourself and this is what the wives and other females around the world do. From the nest perspective a male supposed to be the extension of a female.
Ultimately if a male race is truly successful it would breed on its own and it would not have to knee before a vulnerable race of females to have a purpose in life, a lasting and a meaningful life. Like with the drones it is only to deliver some generic diversity. Most of the public life that is allegedly headed by men is only to facilitate the privacy of the female nests. The obvious effect of it is an overinflated property market because of the arms race of ever bigger and fancier nests.
By the way all the muscle flexing and ruffling is a theatre and more than ever is based on false confidence. Even Miles W. Mathis who claims to be the genius is not free from ruffling as we can witness in some of his wild claims. Actually I see another David Icke in him because he is unapologetic.
John Griffin
I know that John is Jewish not only because he is Griffin but simply by looking at his face. However this does not stop me from promoting him when I sense a man being believable.
As of July 2025 I still watch some of his videos but not regularly (I catch up maybe once every quarter or less). John is still producing good content but he does contradict himself at times.
I think these days he is much lower on his initial bitterness. He regained his confidence and is less vindictive.
I watched his latest video on men’s greatest mistake and I see John is getting himself cornered but because he was some senior insurance salesman I start to see his “bullshit artist” skills in action. I don’t know if you can see it. Like the other red-pill mentors he leads other men away from women I think so there is more women left for him to choose from. You have to laugh.
Recently he said that he is in a relationship with some gorgeous 30+ woman. He had to say it because regardless what audience he produces the content for, even for himself an alleged misogynist it would seem unwise to claim to be single. I doubt that he is in relationship he just wants to look better among his followers. I don’t believe him because at the beginning of his YouTube carrier he claimed that his ex-wife was gorgeous and he showed her picture for a couple of seconds in one of his early video. She isn’t gorgeous. She is 6 out of 10.
Do you see? You “stay single” but I am in a “clever” relationship with a woman. Is it being even in a loose relationship with a woman considered as being single? I don’t think so.
Those red-pill mentors cannot help themselves and bullshit.
Some commenters have rightly said that most jobs in the world are not something that can impress a modern woman and only some men can afford “the mission” and have “a frame”. On top of that a significant number of men lives from pay check to pay check.
You can say that I am overtly critical or jealous of John’s achievement but I just don’t buy it. You are either single or not but he cleverly tries to reconcile both ideas in his head and sell you a lie basically. The idea is to boost his confidence as he emerges victorious among the men he preaches to. I mean they still want to listen to him because he says exactly what they want to hear and on a daily basis. It’s not truth but basic psychology. If John cannot deliver that they will move on and find someone else who does. That’s what it boils down.
I agree with him on the idea of having a mission but I don’t see 4 billion of men in the world, every single one of them being able to come up with an impressive mission. In most cases it is rehashing the same stuff what he also does.
He circled back and now preaches that if you have a mission this will give you access to intelligent men, attractive women and money but what I really see is a bullshit artist in action selling you an insurance policy.
He wants you to stay single but he himself leaves options open. Basically he isn’t any leader of single men.
As I have mentioned this already somewhere else John has a tendency of projecting which is not a good sign. Rather than saying “I” he projects it by saying “You” this or that.
Another recent example was when John projected his own desire on his viewers. The video was about men pulling a plug on a marriage before women do it. Good idea but throughout the long video he hasn’t admitted that this is something he hasn’t done himself as his wife at the time left him first. Something that looks great on the outside could well be the continuation of his revenge mania. He was too late to carry this out on his wife but he can influence other men to do it against their wives what is an ultimate revenge on women.
My claim is that there isn’t any default unity among women nor among men. It is only the hard conditions that unite men (working in extreme conditions, exploration, military, sports). As soon as the opposite sex shows up it all starts falling apart.
I think because his target is a video every or every other day and his slight moon swings influences the content he makes. Some are better than the others what I call “fillers”. His more recent video about marriage is very good. I agree with the idea that marriage – an unfavourable to men governmental contract is to bind most men to women to make men more predictable so Phoenician billionaires know where the money is going to be spent – ever bigger houses, ever bigger kitchens and ever bigger TV sets. Women are a liability and this legal contract was and is to protect them. This does not mean all women are bad but get the idea. Women are a liability because most of them cannot function without Phoenician Intelligence in the pockets by what I mean all these Phoenician apps spying on them and the surrounding. A life with a modern woman supposed to bring some privacy but it is the opposite.
What I wrote below about John is older to what is above.
I agree with some of the observations he lays out however after watching lots of his videos I start to see some flaws in what he says.
He praises his divorce and talks about happiness of being a single man but at the same time talks a lot about his past and he continue to look bitter.
In most recent video he actually came to a realisation that his biggest mistake turned out to be beneficial to him by what I mean his struggle in a marriage what made him a better man?!
And we can see many red-pilled men coming to the very same conclusion.
Why is that?
It is because a man supposed to be the muscle, a warrior, a helper, an extension, a messenger boy for a woman first to his mother then to his female partner. The ones who risk (even their lives) are rewarded e.g. forlorn hope.
The fact that many men fall into the female trap is not only because they have no knowledge of the inter-gender mechanics set in the Stone Age. It is because men through their flaws sense their inferiority in relation to women who are visually, sexually and emotionally superior.
However to match with a women a man has to be mentally compatible if not subservient.
Men are brought to this world to deal with most if not all precarious characteristics of that place. No surprise women promote and go after men who are bad boys but on the other hand who can treat them well. The fact men are stuck between these two worlds a hostile world on one side and the paradiso home nest on the other leads to their constant cognitive dissonance. They try to alleviate it with more work, tinkering, alcohol, drugs and other activities. You supposed to be emotionally limited but emotionally responsive at the same time.
I can tell that men who wear a wedding ring look down upon men who for whatever reasons have not been domesticated as John Griffin puts it, did not subscribe to that lifestyle. And indeed unmarried men are profoundly different comparing to the married men.
I think married men share mutual respect to each other because they all know they have a wife at home who is difficult, who sets the requirements and who uses emotional and sexual means to get what she wants, she badgers him until she gets it.
After watching his more recent video where he compares feminism to narcissism I think he is on the right track.
John is incorrect in terms of men’s lifespan comparing to women’s. He again generalises to make his own point but this 7 years difference is only for the poorest people (those men health is being worn out due to poor working conditions, work with hazardous substances etc. also more alcohol and drug consumption to alleviate the pain).
As the wealth of the married couple increases the gap between men’s and women’s lifespan decreases.
I think John because he deeply thinks of himself as a failure he presents to you an alternate reality he himself does not believe in (he looks confident, well spoken and educated but he cannot help his bitterness). The slogan he always says at the end of every video “remember to stay single” works but not for me.
He considers himself accomplished as a father especially in the case of his son who he recovered from a pathological mother. I appreciate his testimony on that.
However he is not genuine with this “stay single” thing unless his target group are only old and divorced men. It does not make sense for younger men to follow his advice, most will still take a risk just to have children. Things can pan out differently but it’s part of the game of men taking risks with women.
Let’s not forget that John’s father worked in the Navy what he mentioned several times, but I don’t think John is an agent, part of the Women-Are-Pigs project unless the Intelligence employs men who genuinely had bad experiences with women.
John is clearly pissed that he lost his precious time in the relationship that failed long time ago moreover his wife left him for another guy which added insult to injury.
I think him recording a video so regularly is a way of venting out the anger and to alleviate the embarrassment he has been subjected to. I think his approach to that problem is correct.
I watched his more recent video about a plan for a divorced man and many people have already highlighted that he romanticises.
Just so you know and it is a bit worrying but this can be explained as part of John’s couching. He commands you but he actually projects himself onto you. He projects his own ideas and doubts onto his audience to boost his morale.
It looks like his wife was narcissistic only to a degree but not a malignant narcissist. That is why he was able to device this 2.0 arrangement with her and their children.
He talks about the importance of not antagonising a wife including not to badmouth her but I think he to alleviate his frustration badmouthed his wife for the most part.
We don’t know how it was in reality, we only know his part of the story.
The problem is his 2.0 idea does not work with ex-wives who are malignant narcissists reported by a number of men who comment under his videos.
Moreover his advise can be applicable but only to men who kept up with the Joneses for decades and accumulated enough wealth to have the luxury to walk the dogs for days on end.
His most recent conclusion was “I believe each person is given opportunities for growth during their lifetime. Not everyone figures it out. Thanks”
I don’t think the problem is with figuring it out but I reckon he is one of those Jewish hustlers who do.
I wonder what is this guy going to evolve into, what is he going to preach around video 500?
Hoe Math
A lot of his observations are correct.
Unfortunately I disagree with the most recent of his “the hard times create strong men”.
This is not his invention by the way and I have spend extensive amount of time thinking about this. It made sense at the time but I no longer believe it.
He follows with the idea that men are creators and women are consumers and technically women spend a lot more than men.
The thing is the economy itself or the people who rule the world don’t allow for a permanent economical growth and we end up in the cycles.
How come the Great Depression that led to world wars where men fought and died on the battlefields supposed to be a good thing? Did it create brave men?
But at the same time 5 times more traumatised men and women.
Natural selection on steroids?
And the so called “hoeflation” he promotes most likely has little to do with the societal cycles but precisely to do with the economic cycles. When the market is hot and it grows the appetite of the women continue to grow with it but when the decline kicks in women who get use to a better standards of living or luxury are more likely to change for a better partner who can continue to deliver those standards, the luxury rather than expect her to down-size her expectations. But again this will be a woman higher on the spectrum of narcissism not every woman.
I like his way of explaining things in a simple way and I do sympathise with him in regards to his crisis at the age of 36 intensified by the Plandemic. The COVID Plandemic was indeed a wakeup call to many not only to people going through a mid-life crisis.
I disagree with him in regards to the so called “little boy” or what is known in psychology as the Peter Pan syndrome. This is your another proof that men including Hoe Math disciplines himself and his fellow men to the wishes of women because they only want strong men regardless if they are narcissists or psychopaths. Is he bringing enough look back to her nest? Yes, so he must good.
Casey Zander
Casey looks like a pro especially with his cowboy hat.
I think what he says in his videos makes sense but I don’t think it’s applicable to all women. I can agree that all women have these tendencies but most of them cannot afford it and have to settle for an average guy.
I think what he is selling us is all women are narcissistic. Narcissistic women except those covertly narcissistic are more prominent than normal women so this is what you see most of the time on social media.
No other person but myself would take the lead in perceiving all women as narcissistic but I don’t want to do that just yet.
Some of the quote of his and from his audience:
“Women often times choose the worst men possible for them because he’s the most emotionally stimulating”
“With women, indifference makes all the difference” – Corey Wayne
“There needs to be balance too, too little interest or attention makes them bored. Too much makes them bored. Just focus on you and if she likes you, don’t change anything, she liked you for you before she met you, stay that way. If she ever tests you, stay calm and don’t do or say a thing, more often than not she will be back and more obsessed since you showed strength and indifference. And if not, good riddance, the streets can have her back.”
In these examples I can see narcissistic dynamics and women instinctively promoting narcissistic men.
It’s hard to disagree with Casey if we look at manhood / purpose of a man in this world from women’s / “Mother Nature” perspective.
I agree that a man should build his character but must he stand out just to be noticed and valued?
I argue that human kind should go beyond this “natural selection” perpetrated by women. It’s a wasteful race just to maintain this theatre. It’s not very different from winged drones dying once the mating season is over and from a male spider being eaten by a female spider just after the copulation.
So far it’s possible only because the opposite sex reigns the reproductive system.
What Casey wants is for you to excel in a role of a stud but most end up as dead drones. Casey does not care because this is apparently included in the costs.
Legion of Men – Bo Ferec
I listened to the book he recommended “Psycho-cybernetics” by a Jewish man Maxwell Maltz.
The book was written in the 60ties so almost 70 years ago so it’s not aware of very many psychological studies that happened since then. It kind of reinforces this Jewish Christian understanding of the world which is ignorant of narcissism for instance as the general rule is that all people can change for the better.
There are things I agree with like the premise that “there is no way to happiness, happiness is the way”.
The author embraces Jewish/Christian philosophy which means men should be married regardless of the consequences.
And once you are married you not only have to but you must be successful e.g. become a successful salesmen (to shove stuff down other people’s throats).
There are good points he makes but again it’s a tuning guide for people who are closer to success than others anyway.
Besides he backed a lot of his conclusions on people who were successful not because of who they were but primarily because they came from great wealth e.g. the shipbuilder Kaiser. By the way more Jewish oligarchs.
By the way have you seen Bo’s web browser?
He has like 5000 tabs open with Youtube. This guy goes through a lot of videos on YouTube. I don’t want to end up like him, sorry.
Rich Cooper
1. a hipster
2. his advise is inapplicable for most men
3. he creates some weird bubble for men
4. this creates even more different bubbles to isolate men
5. is selling coaching and supplements making a dent in the universe? I am not so sure.
6. keep women entertained by becoming a clown and/or engage in activities delivering a thrill?
7. his advise versus women reinforced by social media
8. do I want to resort to rigging the system in my emotional life?
9. a lunatic man – gentlemen and an ass-hole in one
10. making a dent in the universe? by using the very same platforms that create problems he describes and tries to address?
11. the algorithms serve you the content you will most likely be interested in but is this the sole purpose of those algorithms?
To live just to prove that he didn’t came out of a pussy.
I mean this constant tirade about Beta males. I do not sympathise with Beta males but they do succeed with women. There are more than one technique of approaching women.
When I get a chance next in the pipeline is:
Taraban
Ants