“You don’t have to know what does cause something to know that something doesn’t cause it.”

In this article I will try to do my best to cover all the relevant topics. Last updated: 27/01/2022

You can find useful information at the end of THIS article.
I think the best is to start with a hair mineral analysis provided by many laboratories. This will show your current body status, mineral deficiencies, predispositions of the body not to retain certain elements and reasons behind that, abnormalities and finally dietary suggestions to rectify the problem.

This method reveals a lot of information with little input from you (sex, age, a hair sample)

Comparing to GP who gathers your input then performs tests. The patient concentrates on the effects (e.g. pain). Don’t get me wrong GPs are very good at eliminating bad effects but tell little about bad habits and environmental factors you should address in the first place.

Depression / Sleep problems

magnesium, Passiflora, Lemon Balm, Avena Sativa, St John’s Wort, CBD oil. You can also look into iodine/selenium but this require a strict regimen (it’s not a quick fix). In general you have to abandon the GP quick fix medicine methodology.

Water purification

If one of the greatest globalist, communism pusher & a war criminal Henry Kissinger expresses interest in water and points out that water is going to be scarce in the future I scream and run away from water sources that are under their control.
We already know that not only in UK the Israeli producer of fertilizers based on the Negev Desert dispose toxic byproduct namely Hexafluorosilicic acid and sells this chemical to UK government and then water companies like Severn Trent adds it to their water reservoirs you drink from.

if not possible to build (e.g. a rented property) then you can invest in one of the ceramic filtration systems e.g. Berkey

Or make your own home filtration system using Berkey filters to cut the cost by 80% LINK LINK2 LINK3 LINK4

AQSOLUTIONS – more information

Berkey filters

Fluoride & Arsenic filters

Water fluoridation

The example of UK

A debate that has taken place on a Telegram channel:

Jacob: I interned in a water company in the south of England, Thames Water, for a while. Ask me any questions you have about water fluoridation in the U.K.- what it does, why it’s done, and where it is used

Jay Kay: why don’t they fluoride water down south e.g. Thames Water?

Jacob: In order to understand this we must consider the geology of extraction sites. The North typically has a different geological makeup, particularly around aquifers (water stored underground in naturally porous rocks), to the South. As you’ll know, the South of England predominantly draws water from chalk formations such as the Downs and the Chilterns. While on a molecular level this isn’t significantly different from rock in much of the North, namely limestone (both are made up of a molecule called calcium carbonate), chalk contains more ‘impurities’- basically, free fluoride molecules as compared to limestone. This is partly why chalk rock is so white. Therefore in the North, in order to meet the same basic water safety requirements in the UK, fluoride and fluoride derivatives- mostly mined in the South- are added to water.

in short, water down south naturally contains more fluorides, whereas northern water does not

A person named Jacob who apparently had There are also socio-economic reasons behind fluoridating water in the north, which I’m happy to explain as well

Jay Kay: so what is so special about this substance that they have to add it if it’s missing?

Jacob: I’m glad you asked. As you know from school, our teeth and bones are strengthened by fluoride. This is partly why you feed babies a lot of milk, because milk is relatively fluoride-rich and strengthens their bones.

Fluoride itself is associated in UK studies with a 15%-35% drop in tooth decay and other dental problems, which- given how expensive dentists are- is a good thing. The only thing that leads to a greater drop in tooth decay is regular brushing and flossing, in fact, which leads on to the socio-economic reason for fluoride additives in the north- poorer areas, even within developed countries, have significantly poorer dental hygiene. This is in fact why fluoride additives in water are considered an essential part of the fight against tooth infection in poorer countries.

In the US, a country with a very large poor population, fluoride additives in water are seen as the most important weapon in the fight against tooth infection and save the average US citizen some $600/yr in dental and hospital bills. This is also why bottled water is given out for free in many places, because it contains up to 10x more fluoride than even tap water with fluoride added. However, many richer countries with higher standards of dental health argue that adding fluoride isn’t necessary after a point, because enough people take good care of their teeth. If you’re wealthy, this is certainly true- but if you can’t afford to regularly see a dentist, at least twice a year, then fluoride addition in water will probably save your dental health and your wallet.

In short: fluoride promotes healthy teeth and bones, especially for people who can’t regularly see a dentist

ownagepie:,%20solid&b=UN1690&c=6.1 – a rat poison!

Jacob: Acids are a liquid, right? Does this look like a liquid to you?

Infoninja: They put in IN the water, silly, and then yes, it mixes and creates an acid.

Acid is a scale of PH, and there are many solids which are acidic, which is why you have to put water in car batteries to maintain them. If you tear open a battery you will find that the insides are solid, and yes, in fact, acidic.

Are you for real, bro?

Jacob: Ah lads, the other side look at us and laugh at us because of this sort of thing. We’re pro-freedom, not anti-childrens dental health

Infoninja: Mandating a drug in the water supply of major cities is not freedom.

The Harvard study isn’t science enough for you?

We look at the other side and laugh too. Their opinion means nothing to most in this chat. They laugh at us no matter what they say, because they believe the mainstream narrative about things, while those in the know realize the establishment lies to them every day. Your narrative is the mainstream narrative. There couldn’t be an easier way to find yourself wallowing in ignorance.

Where does the truth lie, hmmm?

Jacob: I don’t think you read the study in that case… it states that the benefits of water fluoridation are better than any negatives that this paper might have identified, and even suggests that a relationship between water fluoridation and IQ might not exist

Infoninja: From the Harvard study:

“The average loss in IQ was reported as a standardized weighted mean difference of 0.45, which would be approximately equivalent to seven IQ points for commonly used IQ scores with a standard deviation of 15.* Some studies suggested that even slightly increased fluoride exposure could be toxic to the brain. Thus, children in high-fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ scores than those who lived in low-fluoride areas. The children studied were up to 14 years of age, but the investigators speculate that any toxic effect on brain development may have happened earlier, and that the brain may not be fully capable of compensating for the toxicity.”


That’s not from the study. That’s from a press release about the study. You can tell this because your quotation includes the words ‘the investigators speculate’. The actual study, found here: states:

‘each of the articles reviewed had deficiencies, in some cases rather serious ones, that limit the conclusions that can be drawn’

‘The standardized weighted mean difference in IQ score between exposed and reference populations was –0.45 (95% confidence interval: –0.56, –0.35) using a random-effects model.’

‘We specifically targeted studies carried out in rural China that have not been widely disseminated’

It is important to conclude that this particular study, which is a meta-analysis of a select number of papers from the field, finds a statistically observable decrease in IQ among boys, but does not find this same statistically observable decrease in IQ among girls. Subsequent research by numerous later authors, including Ruszkiewicz et al. (2018), Philip et al. (2018), Allukian et al. (2018), and Nicole (2019) finds this relationship either nonexistent or attributable to different factors. In fact, Sun et al. (2017) hypothesises that fluoride exposure in developing countries comes primarily from poorly-regulated infant and baby formula (sold by J&J, who manufactured a vaccine), which was also supported by Viswanathan (2018) who specifically observed that in Telangana, India, children are at a greater risk of dental fluorosis owing to the practice of mixing infant formula into tea and feeding it to children.
This Harvard study is just about the only one that directly correlates groundwater fluorides (so: not fluoride added in a water plant but water that has naturally high fluoride concentrations) with a decrease of 0.45 IQ points in boys. Subsequent research illustrates that offloading fluorides to infants is significantly more effective when given to children with infant formula. Even so, science never has ‘the’ answer so we must, as Choi et al. (2012)- the Harvard study- conclude: ‘Future research should formally evaluate dose–response relations based on individual-level measures of exposure over time, including more precise prenatal exposure assessment’. Basically- more research, factoring in more ways of excessive fluoride consumption. I for one won’t ever be buying baby formula from J&J, anyway…

Infoninja: Drink your fluoride then. Don’t let me get in the way of your happiness and success. 🙂

Shadow Poet Of Rage:

FLUORIDE THE DEVILS POISON”, HITLER had TONS at each CAMP, High Dose in Water Keep People like WALKING DEAD they did not try to ESCAPE,…
Check it mister fluoride

Jacob: Of course, it’s a free world. Just trying to help!

You said that this is for dental health of poor children up north because the south has fluoride naturally occurring but why water companies like Severn Trent adds 4 times more fluoride than it is in Thames Water pipes (naturally occurring)?

Thames Water – 0.18mg/l on average (calcium fluoride)
Severn Trent – 0.8mg/l on average (sodium fluoride or Hexafluorosilicic acid)

To me the idea of delivering toxic substances through water supply to prevent tooth decay is suspicious to say the least. People and children are drinking this water not using it just to flush their mouths which IS A BIG DIFFERENCE.
More information at

error: Content is protected !!