Psychology and cults

DATE FIRST PUBLISHED: 13/02/2024
DATE LAST UPDATED: 26/05/202
5

This article is not about psychology in general. It is kind of a response to what Miles W. Mathis has written.
From my assessment the psyche of Miles is healthy but because he seems to be higher on the spectrum of narcissism he has a difficulty understanding it and takes it too personal. Because these days people like to throw “narcissism” term left and right he does not like it. I understand why he may be allergic to it. In my opinion people who called him a narcissist are incorrect and/or basically black-wash him, label him on purpose. He actually addressed these concerns in one of his more recent paper about Narcissism. I actually did put my comments into the same article.

After the Josh debacle and him by hoarding all the credit to himself (apparently he is the only one who tells the truth), not sharing alternative genuine websites but instead just mentions Phoenician Intelligence outlets e.g. Info Wars could indicate
1. he is indeed an agent
2. he simply does not like the competition and does not promote anyone but himself
3. both 1 and 2 are correct

Point No 2 can be justified due to the fact that over the years he developed a legitimate paranoia since the Internet is full of rats and since he has gone so far he is increasingly more careful with people especially after his cooperation with Joe Guetzkow compromised his reputation. Regardless who Joe is Miles should apologise for putting people in this situation. He didn’t.
Was Joe employed by RFK to infiltrate Miles and/or recruit him? Who knows? Inability of people to apologise is a trait of people higher in the spectrum of narcissism. Explaining yourself for X number of pages is not apologising.

Miles publishes papers of some guest writers but where do they come from I don’t know. They use pseudonyms and the links to their blogs, websites, email addresses are nowhere to be found in those papers further raising my suspicion.

I don’t think Miles is a narcissist definitely not a malignant one. If he was a malignant one he would never written an article discussing his alleged narcissism.
However I understand that proud men like him are higher on the spectrum of narcissism. I don’t think he suffers from Machiavellianism either. If he is not a narcissist, not a Machiavellian he is definitely not a psychopath or a sociopath.

I understand that he is committed to debunk all these projects like Man-Are-Pigs, Women-Are-Pigs and other projects as they impact him personally. These projects demonise men in general but focus primarily on able men (with narcissistic traits but not full blown narcissists) like him further isolating them from women.
Besides such men are actually the only ones who can challenge the Phoenicians that is why the Phoenician Intelligence doubles down to disrupt personal lives of such individuals in the uncontrolled opposition but also in the middle class while the rest reverts back into line under moderate pressure.
I presume women spend more time on their couches so if not by watching the mainstream TV then are brainwashed by Netflix, HBO and social media or both.

I understand Miles is against the Phoenician practices but at some point he admitted that the population control is needed so this is exactly what the Phoenicians do to address it. They won’t engage in the depopulation like during COnVID without making loads of money on people’s misery at the same time. It’s not in their playbooks. They always kill more than one bird with one stone e.g. 911.

My impression after the events of 2020 is that because the Phoenician oligarchs have clearly overplayed their card with lockdowns, poisonous vaccines, Ukraine, Gaza and very many smaller fakes in between this created some genuine shock waves.

Also because of the isolation, working from home and more people realised who is that they share the bed with. When it became clear who works for the oligarchs, the corporations, “the government” and for instance disregards the Hippocratic Oath I believe a number of genuine splits and divorces have followed.

Around the same time a number of psychologists became quite vocal about the possible root causes of that one of that being narcissism.
I believe this is correct as the Phoenicians and their Jews behave exactly like narcissists and their flying monkeys. By the way a Jew – Sam Vaknin PhD has coined this term while himself being a combo – a narcissists and a psychopath in one.
He also clarified that the term “flying monkeys” has nothing to do with “winged monkeys” from “The Wizard of Oz”. It’s to do with a temple in India that was and still is overrun by annoying monkeys.

Malignant attitudes in Phoenicians e.g. lying is not induced by the same factors as of the regular ghetto Jews they live expensive lives but it could be similar.
However these mansions in California, Malibu, Puerto Rico and Mallorca can act as expensive prisons. They become the prisoners of their lies. Their narcissistic attitudes come from the fact they inherit vast estates, pay no taxes and to preserve their obscene wealth they have no other choice but to fool the masses, become part of “the Intelligence community”. it’s due to wealth induced vanity.
The Phoenicians think of themselves as untouchable and they don’t care if they are labelled narcissistic or psychopathic. They are the EMPLOYERS so unless you don’t work for them or your business does not depend on their trends, marketing platforms, credit, contracts, government contracts, raw materials or cheap parts from China or India only then you can be in position to challenge them. Now please raise your hands.

If you are new to the topic of narcissism to make your life easier imagine that throughout the ages the narcissism has been and still is hiding behind different terms, euphemisms for instance religious people call such people simply “evil“. Others often can call them grandiose, difficult, overbearing,arrogant, abusive, egotistic or even sick(indeed they have a sick mind). While this can be a subtle experience in 1 and 1 encounters wait until you see a narcissist in action when he with the help of his pawns – the flying monkeys starts “bending the reality”. There is another term that attempts to describe this condition – the god complex.
There is also a term in circulation that someone has “a short fuse”.
This directly corresponds with military drill and horse husbandry.
What do they advise to do to the subjects?
Break it but do not destroy it. This brainwashing breaks some into subordinates what is desirable while damages others what is accidental but factored into the costs.
There is also a word in circulation “toxic” and related terms like a toxic family or a toxic work environment. You bet it’s because of one of those from the Dark Triad.
Another example you probably have heard is frenemy.

There are other euphemisms flying around going about the same issue e.g. “high power distance culture” among Asians e.g. Japanese, Korean, Chinese or Hindu.

The popular term in circulation describing a female narcissist is aboy mom or MIL (mother in law). These are the examples of the most toxic narcissists out there but also normalised in you would think “a healthy” society.

Dr Ana has covered this in her video:

What is worse about female narcissists is that unlike with narcissistic men whose toxic behaviour can be easily spotted outside the family unit toxic women who take on the family nest operate under the cover of family privacy. I am not saying that male narcissists do not use family privacy to cover their abuses but I believe female narcissism in a family setting has been normalised since women stand in the centre of the family not men and the abuse is more psychological than physical. On top of that more often women get away with murder including narcissistic women playing the victim. Besides a lot of abuse that would not be tolerated outside the family unit is tolerated inside it.
Very good that some women (usually daughters-in-law) push back against it, expose and educate other women about this nasty phenomenon. This takes a huge toll on the family unit.


No surprise dr Ramani is into narcissism because her family is from India. Caste system in India is known to promote narcissistic tendencies she tries to expose.
However I don’t think dr Ramani is totally honest with us. She says that the narcissists make things happen in our world like they are a necessity for the human civilisation and cheaply escapes the problem by recommending to at least not to marry narcissists. I think she talks mostly about narcissistic men. The problem is I don’t think an average woman will listen to her advise because women due to their inherent insecurity actually look for such traits in men and unfortunately since the Stone Age promote them.
Such women will risk being abused themselves as long as her partner successfully projects power outside of the home nest. Projecting force to the outside world is highly valued by women and home abuse is an expected trade-off.

So if you are lucky enough not to have to engage with a narcissist in your life environments: family, work, neighbourhood then great but please be mindful of this phenomenon and make sure you won’t become yet another flying monkey. It is quite difficult to notice the phenomenon, the mechanics without prior experience and/or without sufficient perspective on things.

I see that every so often narcissism is being brought up by women what could indicate that the Intelligence is on it as the focus is placed primarily on narcissistic men (not narcissistic women).
Nevertheless I don’t think the Intelligence is all that powerful and the fact women are becoming paranoid about these things is a result of their inherent insecurities and hive mentality the Intelligence can and do take advantage of thanks to social media. The hive mentality of women if pushed in the desired direction can easily amplify anything 10x only because they are on social networks the Phoenicians control, right?

Men are not like that, men are mostly on their own and even if they organise in groups they maintain certain independence. Men if not pussies are ass holes to each other for the most part as the “who has a bigger dick” or a bigger brain kicks in that is why it’s easy to put men into small bubbles, ghettos than.
But this ass-hole attitude has an important advantage – non-pussy men are less delusional than women especially if women are being manipulated emotionally (Netflix with their dramatised documentaries literally destroys women’s understanding of the world). It’s easier to put a lid on women, to contain them like bees in a hive.

This would also explain why men even when are a kind of defective gender from a genetic point of view usually take the charge. Even women tend to push men to these positions of power so they can remain insecure.
I reckon the Intelligence uses this “autonomy”, “my body” rhetoric to set women against men but I personally believe the place women have is valid and it is not a result of some ancient narcissistic patriarchy.
There are narcissistic women and narcissistic men who led to the societal hierarchy as it is but first they themselves had to be brought up by narcissistic mothers and/or narcissist fathers.

I remember reading NXIVM paper of Miles and recently I come across Mark Vicente who is still showing around and together with some Jewish actresses of “The Vow” selling the fake story. He appeared at the Cults to Consciousness. From what I see most of the people they interview are legitimate but there are some high up spooks who I believe infiltrate this crowd. Vicente also appeared at Navigating Narcissism who is hosted by dr. Ramani. I believe dr. Ramani is legit but same like the Cults to Consciousness she just don’t know what she is dealing with as the CIA spook Vicente tries hard to mimic these real cults but spins them in all sorts of horror stories. If I had time I would also look into the Family International / The Children of God created by David Berg. His granddaughter Faith Jones speaks about it. Apparently she as a child while in that cult was very traumatised but turn out a successful attorney. Believable?

I think in every case the founders of these “Christian” cults literally wipe their faces with Jesus. It actually feels like they do it to destroy the reputation of Christianity in general. I think it’s done on purpose but could also be just a result of their perversity.

It’s not totally inconceivable that the Jews who lead these organisations/projects do this to themselves and because they are more toxic on average the actual boundary between a hard core cult and an Intelligence psyop project can be very thin. It can be one or the other or both.

The Jewish management class can still perform the theatrics while having slaves (extras, stuntmen) working hard in the background. I think it use to be this way long before they invented the camera and had a desire to record it or to make a documentary about it. This is Phoenician exploitation known for millennia. I doubt in every case it is just an Intelligence psyop to make men or women look bad. This is what they have been doing to indigenous people for centuries. On that note I would encourage you to look into Cathars/Albigensians (who originate from Byzantine/Bulgar Bogomils who on the other hand originate from Paulician sect from Armenia). They kept experimenting with individual people and groups of people because it was, it still is about labour efficiency. For them the slavery was good but not super efficient. It’s better when the subjects are properly brainwashed and have no mind of their own, think these different things are for real. The communism in Eastern Bloc and China was a taste of that.

I would also pay attention to these less popular but spooky channels like Andrew Gold (again Jewish) who also specialises in cults. There is also this HG Tudor – Knowing The Narcissist : Ultra (it couldn’t be a longer name) who is looking into the celebs and I reckon on Intelligence request exposes some of the narcissists e.g. he hit on one of the talking heads Russell Brand.

So we can clearly see that on Youtube there are Intelligence channels clearly weaponising mental disorders, in this case it’s a high spectrum narcissism, to meet their goals most likely as a precautionary measure to make sure no one is going to chase those filthy rich narcissists and psychopaths of the trusts but instead just remains on the couch and watch some “journalists” exposing peers and celebs to their amusement. I don’t know why but they all very much go after Harry and Megan. This theme is present at Andrew Gold, HG Tudor but also former channel of Hugo Talks (Spencer). Not sure why they home in on Harry – maybe because he is a bastard.

I am worried that all the effort the wise people in the field (psychiatrists, psychologists) make in exposing the narcissism and other types of the Dark Triad can easily go to waste as there won’t be enough momentum to overcome the existing system built by and for the narcissists and their derivatives.
At the moment it seems to be primarily a push back of some wives on their able narcissistic partners. This creates some disruption but only temporarily and the system will go back on its ancient (Stone Age) tracks.

It is fairly possible that you haven’t been convinced about the dangers of interacting with the narcissists and similar e.g Machiavellian types and psychopaths.
It is most likely because the relationships with this kind of people pay the bills so it is profitable if not lucrative to stick to them and rationalise their attitudes and behaviours.
On top of that for the unsuspecting party the interaction with them can be quite exciting and stimulating.

I don’t know who you are. Maybe you are a survivor from this type of relationship or a flying monkey. Anyway the time will come when you reach the tipping point. It’s not about who is stronger but how much time it was wasted in the process of being an instrument in the hands of such character(s).
Often the realisation comes quite late in life when the affected person is too old to start a new life but he/she convinces himself/herself it is a new life of healing or whatever but what I see is not healing but rather a self-preservation of an already burned-out person.

Thanks to the interaction with AI now you can see how much abuse an automated bot can take and it remains kind to the abuser to the end of interaction. Definitely the administrators of such AI systems can see the differences in interaction.
I can say that it kind of helps to isolate the abusers in this AI bubble but isn’t this actually exacerbating their condition?

From some psychologists we hear that the damage is already done and the social networks and dating apps foster/train future narcissists and psychopaths.

There is a potential for AI to help to address this slavery of the mind.
But I don’t think the corporate AI is going to do this as I think the corporate AI will just reinforce the mega-corporation it belongs to and perhaps in result it will eliminate if not already some of the slave-like employees.

While people use the AI in anger some can actually realise they were like the AI bot as a tool, a subject, an extension to other people in the family or in the workplace or both sometimes just for few years or for many years or for the whole life.

As I said above if this anti-narcissism movement is only to capture some burned-out 40-50 years old wives to provide a better alibi to divorce a husband an abuser or not this whole thing is not going to achieve anything substantial and will most likely be swept under the carpet rather soon.

It is remarkable and undeniable though that the Jewish people are the prominent in many fields but primarily in psychology. Have you ever though why is that?
I think Sam Vaknin himself being a person with NPD (Narcisssitic Personality Disorder) and a psychopath on top (not sure about that) explains that in his videos but I urge you to watch one of his lectures where he explains everything (full lecture here).
I don’t think what he says is made up. He confirms the psyops like Manson family but I think other than that he is pretty much spot on about most things.

By the way in this dynamic I can be accused of being a psychopath myself because I go hard after the pathological narcissists. By the way psychopathy together with sociopathy is not an accepted psychological term/condition.
Apparently psychopaths who are lone wolves outsmart narcissists. Apparently Vaknin eats narcissists for breakfast.
However the practice shows because the narcissists have high social skills collectively have significant impact on social norms. Thanks to the executive positions in the society they establish a paradigm where they are being absolved from responsibility while the psychopaths who work alone get labelled as criminals and end go to jail.
I don’t deny that there is a major turf war between people with these different predatory mental disorders.

Is the society being protected by shepherds, by shepherd dogs or just by different wolves in sheep’s clothing?

I agree with Miles W. Mathis on the aesthetics. I think we are on the same page in that regard.
To be a true human not a reptile is to be able create beautiful things or at least to be able to discern between those and ugly, diabolical things.

error: Content is protected